Study summary

Electrolyzed water spray scrubber for removing ammonia from air

Transactions of the ASABE · 2015

Summary

Abstract

Ammonia (NH3) emissions from animal feeding operations (AFOs) are the source of a number of environmental issues. Wet spray scrubbers using non-acidic solutions might be a new approach for NH3 mitigation from AFOs. A lab-scale spray scrubber was built to clean 0.024 m3 s-1 of an NH3/air mixture with an average NH3 concentration of 20 ppmv. Three variables including contact time, nozzle type, and scrubbing solution were investigated to evaluate their effects on the ammonia removal efficiency of the scrubber. The contact times were to 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 s, which were achieved by changing the elevation of the spray nozzle. Two types of spray nozzles were studied. The nozzles had full-cone spray patterns with different spray angles and different the scrubbing solution.

Study details

  • Published in: Transactions of the ASABE 58.4 (2015): 1069-1078
  • Microbes studied: None

Source

Read the original study

Source: Transactions of the ASABE 58.4 (2015): 1069-1078

Conditions tested

ParameterValue
Relevant sectorsLivestock
PublicationTransactions of the ASABE, 2015

Reading this responsibly

Published figures are obtained under controlled conditions, usually on clean surfaces or in defined matrices. Organic load, surface condition, temperature and application coverage all affect real-world performance. Use these numbers to design a protocol, then validate it on your own site with environmental swabbing.

Applying it

Concentrations in this range are within the adjustable output of every EcoloxTech commercial system, so implementing this protocol is a settings question rather than a procurement one. Where the claim needs to sit on a registered label, see HOCl-AS200, EPA Reg. No. 101112-1.

Source

View the published study

Turn the evidence into a protocol

We size the system, set the concentration and contact time, write the SOP and assemble the citations — free, and in writing.