Study summary

Comparison of electrolyzed oxidizing water with other antimicrobial interventions to reduce pathogens on fresh pork

Meat Science · 2004

Summary

Abstract

To date, the effectiveness of electrolyzed oxidizing (EO) water against bacteria associated with fresh pork has not been determined. Using a hand-held, food-grade garden sprayer, distilled water (W), chlorinated water (CL; 25 ppm), 2% lactic acid (LA), acidic EO water (EOA), or aged acidic EO water (AEOA; stored at 4 C for 24 h) was sprayed (15 s) onto pork bellies inoculated with feces containing Listeria monocytogenes (LM), Salmonella typhimurium (ST), and Campylobacter coli (CC). Remaining bacterial populations were determined immediately following treatment, after 2 days of aerobic storage, and again after 5 days of vacuum-packaged, refrigerated storage (day 7). While LA and EOA significantly reduced (p0.05) between antimicrobial treatments when applied to pork inoculated with ST or LM. This study demonstrates that a 15-s spray with EOA has the ability to reduce CC associated with fresh pork surfaces. However, longer contact times may be necessary to reduce other microbial contaminants.

Study details

  • Published in: Meat Science 68.3 (2004): 463-468
  • Microbes studied: Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella typhimurium, Campylobacter coli

Source

Read the original study

Source: Meat Science 68.3 (2004): 463-468

Conditions tested

ParameterValue
OrganismsCampylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella
Relevant sectorsFood Processing, Meat
PublicationMeat Science, 2004

Reading this responsibly

Published figures are obtained under controlled conditions, usually on clean surfaces or in defined matrices. Organic load, surface condition, temperature and application coverage all affect real-world performance. Use these numbers to design a protocol, then validate it on your own site with environmental swabbing.

Applying it

Concentrations in this range are within the adjustable output of every EcoloxTech commercial system, so implementing this protocol is a settings question rather than a procurement one. Where the claim needs to sit on a registered label, see HOCl-AS200, EPA Reg. No. 101112-1.

Source

View the published study

Turn the evidence into a protocol

We size the system, set the concentration and contact time, write the SOP and assemble the citations — free, and in writing.